Water-Energy Nexus

energy earth websiteWater and energy are fundamental to life on Earth.  Water, which covers most of the planet, is essential to both basic biological processes and advanced economic systems.  Energy empowers living organisms and makes our modern life possible.  Most people, however, don’t fully recognize the connection between water and energy.  Water is used in the production of energy.  Energy is used to process and distribute clean water.  This interrelationship is known as the Water-Energy Nexus and is important to understand when considering critical systems infrastructure. Water in Energy

Water is used in various fashions in the production of energy.  On one far side of the nexus, energy is produced in the absence of water.  Technologies such as wind turbines and photovoltaic cells don’t require water as they are generating power. However, a comprehensive lifecycle analysis would show that the manufacturing process of solar panels and the steel and concrete used in the construction of wind turbines do require water.  The next step along the nexus shows water use in conventional energy.  It is used extensively in fossil fuel extraction as well as a coolant in thermoelectric power generation.  Major considerations here include water quantity and quality. While evaporated water isn’t “wasted” from the point of view of the closed system of the planet, regional supply and demand are major factors. The middle of the nexus shows water as an energy source such as through the use of hydroelectric dams.  Todd Loar and Robyn McGuckin with MWH Global, a leader in “wet infrastructure”, presented at the recent Energy Africa Conference held at the Colorado School of Mines. They raised the audience’s awareness of the Water-Energy Nexus through sharing experiences and perspectives from their company’s expertise in engineering, construction, and consulting for infrastructure projects involving both energy and water.  

Energy for Water

Purifying and transporting water requires energy. In nature, this is known as the hydrological cycle.  Energy from the sun heats water into evaporation and it later precipitates once it cools.  Cities are dense areas of water consumption.  This demand often exceeds the natural supply in the area.  The physical and chemical processes used in municipal and industrial sized water treatment plants require significant amounts of energy.  According to a 2007 state assembly committee report, "In California, water related energy use, which includes the conveyance, storage, treatment, distribution, wastewater collection, treatment, and discharge sectors of the water use cycle, consumes about 19 percent of the state’s electricity, 30 percent of its natural gas, and 88 billion US gallons (330,000,000 m3) of diesel fuel every year–and this demand is growing." Part of this energy demand stems from the fact that ⅔ of California’s precipitation falls in the north, while ⅔ of the state’s population lives in the south. On the far side of the nexus, “water without energy” represents the billions of people who don’t have energy to clean and distribute their water for them.  For many around the world, several hours a day must be spent carrying water.  Though not exclusively a female problem, much of this responsibility falls to women and can limit their ability to gain an education or a job outside the home. According to the U.N., diarrhea is the leading cause of illness and death globally. Lack of access to pure drinking water and sanitation is responsible.

Interrelated systems

The Water-Energy Nexus is a broadly encompassing concept that ranges from solar panels on one side, to a child dying every 20 seconds from lack of sanitation and the resulting dehydration.  The purpose of MWH Global’s presentation as well as this ICOSA article and accompanying online video is to raise awareness.  Water and energy are critically interrelated and this relationship has implications for the environment, the economy, for business, and for human lives.  As humanity faces unprecedented challenges, comprehensive understanding is necessary for improving designs of our planet’s systems.

Learn more at www.MWHGlobal.com or www.UNwater.org

Reinventing American Education: Douglas County Schools Strives to Be the Best in the World

Game changer.  Risk taker.  Innovator.  Collaborator.  These are just a few of the desired traits sought by the nation’s largest employers. “Unfortunately, for the last 100 years the American education system has been geared toward outcomes suited more for the assembly lines of the Industrial Revolution rather than the economy of the future,” says Douglas County School District (DCSD) Superintendent, Dr. Elizabeth Fagen. “Our goal is to prepare our students to compete on the world stage for the college or career pathway of their choice.” Douglas County School District (DCSD) is located a short 20 minutes south of Denver, Colorado.  The 63,000-student district spans 900 square miles and is home to some of the highest ranking schools in the state. In fact, DCSD ranked #1 in reading achievement in the metro area, but maintaining the status quo is not enough for Dr. Fagen or the reform-minded school board.

“We want more for our students and our community, so we are transforming education,” says Fagen.  “We don’t want to be the best in the state or even the nation.  We want to be the best in the world.

Dr. Fagen’s passion for reform is evident in every aspect of her daily routine—from regular school visits, to parent communications, to teaching professional development classes for teachers and administrators.   With a goal of preparing students to compete on a global stage for any college or career path they choose, DCSD is implementing a systemic transformation plan.  The plan begins with focusing education on new outcomes aligned to what students will need to compete on the global stage, and continues with better approaches to measuring and teaching those outcomes.

Fagen explains the plan and the urgency to parents and the community with a simple comparison to the medical profession.  “Would you be satisfied if your doctor employed techniques from the year he graduated from medical school, or would you expect him to use the latest, less intrusive and safer techniques?” Fagen asks.  “Our challenge is to transform our classrooms and our teaching methods designed in the 1900s into a learning environment for the future.”

As the mother of two young daughters, Fagen also has a personal interest in making sure DCSD continues to be innovative.  “My 2-year-old can effectively navigate my iPad,” says Fagen.   “We know that students learn differently now, and we must employ new strategies to meet their needs and prepare them for the future workforce.”

Education is in her blood.  Fagen’s mother was a teacher, and she followed in her mother’s footsteps.  She started in the educational trenches as a high school science teacher in Iowa.  She served as a high school principal in two schools, and worked her way up the ranks in the Des Moines School District, as director of high schools and associate superintendent before being hired as the superintendent for the Tucson Unified School District in Tucson, Arizona.  The Douglas County School Board unanimously hired her as their superintendent in July 2010.  DCSD Board of Education President John Carson affirmed the board’s selection of her saying, “Dr. Fagen’s proven track record of success as a superintendent, her experience as a teacher and professional in the education field, her advocacy for parental choice and her demonstrated leadership in innovative reforms in public education make her an excellent choice to lead Douglas County School District.” 

Under Fagen’s leadership, DCSD developed a strategic plan based on four district traditions—excellence, innovation, efficiency and safety—and focused on three major priorities:  choice, world-class education and system performance.  The timeline for implementation of the plan is very aggressive.  “We can’t wait,” says Fagen. 

Choice

DCSD acknowledges that every child learns differently. Instead of offering students the one-size-fits-all education that most school districts provide, Fagen explains these focus areas below, in her own words. 

She says, we have been committed to providing our students and their families with the tools they need to find the learning environment that best meets their needs and provides them with the maximum opportunity for success.

With feedback from our community, the district created 27 different strategies to expand choice in Douglas County.  Strategies range from developing science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) and Artful Learning programs at our neighborhood schools, to supporting charter schools, to revising open-enrollment policy. Still, the single program that has dominated the headlines has been DCSD’s Choice Scholarship Program.

In 2011, the school board took an unprecedented vote to create the first district-authorized program of its kind in the United States. The Choice Scholarship Pilot Program was approved and launched for 500 students in the 2011–12 school year.  Under the program, eligible students can receive scholarships worth the lesser of private school tuition, or 75 percent of their per-pupil public revenue ($4,575 for 2011–12), and families are allowed to supplement the scholarships.  Unlike other voucher programs, the district remains accountable for the scholarship students by having them participate in the same state and district testing as every other student.  Each private school partner was fully vetted to ensure that scholarship students are in a stable, private school environment that has a track record of academic performance at least as strong the district schools.    

The program was placed on hold when then ACLU sued not only the district, but also the Colorado Department of Education, citing violations of the Colorado Constitution prohibiting the use of public monies for private and religious schools.  The case is currently awaiting a hearing at the Colorado Court of Appeals. 

“I think it’s pretty simple to understand that our goal is to guarantee that every single child who lives in Douglas County receives an educational experience that provides the maximum opportunity for success, or as sometimes we say ‘unleash the genius of every child.’ We know that you don’t unleash that genius by using a one-size-fits-all system, so opening the door for parents and allowing them to explore other options that we don’t have in the district allows a student to reach his or her full potential,” continues Fagen.  “For me, that’s what it’s all about.”

The Choice Scholarship Pilot Program was crafted following the model of other programs that have been upheld by state courts and the U.S. Supreme Court. Like the federal Pell Grant, it is the parent, not the district, that chooses where state funding will be spent.

World-class education

“Terms like 21st-century and world-class have become somewhat cliché, but in Douglas County when we say ‘world-class,’ we mean it,” says Fagen.  “We have reviewed the research, data, literature and best practices to create a synthesis of the best-of-the-best in modern education.  We have reviewed the most desired attributes in a modern workforce from companies like Nike, Apple, Cisco, Intel and Google, and we have aligned our work to make the changes necessary to ensure that our students are the best prepared in the world.”

According to Fagen, most adults describe their educational experience as memorization of information and developing skills such as reading and writing.  “We have to remember that when we were starting our education system, we were preparing students to be assembly-line workers.  That’s not what we need today.”

She continues, “The first step for us is to rethink what we teach—even to really broaden the idea of the word ‘teach.’  Teachers are less dispellers of knowledge, and more facilitators of skill development.”  DCSD has created the Douglas County Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum, and according to Fagen, it is pushing the boundaries.  “Part of having a world-class education is having  world-class outcomes focused on the right things—developing highly creative kids that can collaborate with people around the world; children that can communicate through writing, speaking and listening; and children that can think critically, who understand how to collect research and synthesize it, evaluate it, and come out with something new.”   Assessing these outcomes is where Douglas County really earns the reputation of a pioneer.

System performance

DCSD is engaged in creating a cutting-edge system performance framework that will not only measure student performance, but also measure the performance of teachers, schools, administrators and the district overall.  Dr. Fagen and her team have been collaborating with teachers to develop new outcomes and measure what is important.  

“For the past 10 years, we have been obsessed with standardized testing, but we have neglected to pay attention to whether those tests measure what students really need to be successful,” says Fagen.  DCSD is creating a Balanced Assessment System that will authentically measure the most important outcomes for students.

The data collected in the new system will also inform the new pay for performance compensation system for DCSD employees.  “The goal of the system is to recruit and retain the very best teachers and employees.  We know that is what is going to be best for our students.  The research is clear: the quality of the teacher is the number-one factor impacting student success,” explains Fagen.

Once the transition is complete to the new system, teachers who are effective and highly effective will have opportunities for pay increases and bonuses.  Those who are not will receive feedback and training to improve their skills. Opportunities for professional development through coaching and training will, however, be available to all employees, ensuring that exemplary employees become models for others in their field.  

“We can’t give everyone flat raises year after year because that violates our belief that teachers should be paid like professionals—that great teachers should make more than good teachers, and good teachers should make more than fair teachers,” says Fagen   “Good teachers are not afraid of accountability, they are afraid of accountability gone wrong—the kind we have experienced for the past 10 years due to No Child Left Behind.  We are going to show the world that we can identify the most important outcomes for our students, measure them the right way, and use that data to reward our amazing employees.”

There is little argument that Douglas County is on the cutting edge of reform and has drawn the attention of leaders across the nation.  Ken Kay, CEO of EdLeader 21, an organization of education professionals, recognized the district as a beacon for the rest of the country.  “I am impressed with Douglas County Schools’ approach to 21st-century learning.  They have not only identified the important learning outcomes, but are committed to embedding them in key education strategies in the district such as incentives, compensation and technology,” Kay said.   

Transforming the district into a 21st-century model is not without challenges.  DCSD’s collective bargaining agreement with the teachers’ union expired June 30, 2012.  The district conducted public negotiations, which allowed Fagen and her cabinet to go out and talk to teachers.  Her team used the feedback to draft a budget and negotiations package with three major goals—maintain fiscal stability, improve employees’ quality of life through a raise and additional benefits, and prepare every student to compete on the world stage for any college or career of their choice.  “We had hoped to come to a consensus and were disappointed that we could not agree on what we believed would be best for our students,” says Fagen.

After the collective bargaining agreement expired, Fagen’s team put together a compensation and benefits program, which replaced the collective bargaining agreement, and the school board acted quickly on behalf of its employees.  “With the expiration of the collective bargaining agreement, we wanted to provide our outstanding teachers and staff with assurance,” says Board President Carson.  “The raise and improved benefits package will be effective July 1,and employees will see the increased compensation on their next paycheck.” 

Changing education is a long, difficult process, but it must be done.  “We are going to continue down the path we started.  We are educating our future leaders and reinventing American education,” continues Fagen.  “We know that we can create the innovators, game-changers and risk-takers that the American workforce requires.”  Fagen recognizes that what is happening in Douglas County will have a broader effect.  “American education has always been a foundation of the American economy, and if we are successful, it can continue to be,” she says.  “Our students will be the best prepared in the world, and that will be good for our students, Douglas County, Colorado and our country.”

 For more information about Douglas County School District and their strategic plan, visit www.dcsdk12.org or contact the Community Relations Department at 303-387-0030.

The More Things Change: Continuity and Change in the Fire Service

Who was it who said, "Children today are tyrants. They contradict their parents. They gobble their food. They tyrannize their teachers."And what's the connection between these comments, and a discussion of continuity and change in the fire service?

 

The dictionary defines "continuity" and "change" as being nouns when they refer to an individual's ability to lead or transform. I believe they are really verbs, in that leadership influences people, provides purpose and motivates others to act.

 

More a role than a concept, continuity and change foster leadership at every level of an organization, even at the lowest level. To confirm the obvious—having a title, rank or seniority doesn't in and of itself earn respect—you have to work for it, and then earn it!

Continuity and change are also less about ego, ideology or about those who want to be something, more than they want to do something. Cultural change is complex and ambitious in the best of times, requiring leadership from individuals who have a unique blend of skills and attitudes, not the least of which are humility, humor, patience, street smarts and a sense of urgency. Leaders also need formal training and an intuitive sensitivity to the dynamics of organizational change.

 

The need for continuity and cultural change in government, industry or the fire service isn't for the faint-of-heart. They're the realm of the pragmatic idealist; the leader who understands that the health of an organization depends on the health of its organic parts. Our greatest legacy, then, is how well we prepare others to lead, embrace organizational continuity, and understand that the real test of both is in their vision and their execution. Visions that are simply slogans can't ever be successfully executed, with execution often being the missing link between aspirations and results.

 

That said, how then do we link the past to the present, as we prepare for the future? And how do we reconcile the definition of continuity as being an uninterrupted connection—the belief that the foundation for a better tomorrow must be laid today, with the presumption that change doesn't assure progress, but progress requires change?

 

Each industry sees "continuity" through its own lens. Technology and business continuity refer to protecting clients from unanticipated business interruption. Cinemagraphic continuity refers to thematic consistency (e.g., over eight Harry Potter movies). Medical continuity refers to ensuring clinical operations, patient care and other essential services. Philanthropic continuity refers to charitable consistency. Media continuity refers to the availability of news and entertainment programming wherever and whenever you want it. Reputation continuity refers to protecting your most prized and vulnerable asset. Emergency response continuity refers to implementing and maintaining organizational and community-wide preparedness for natural or human-made disasters. And continuity in the fire service can best be summarized by its unspoken motto, "We're 150 years old unimpeded by progress." Let me repeat that: "We're 150 years old unimpeded by progress." What's really meant by such an acerbic concept, and how can we use the words "change" and "continuity" so interchangeably?

 

Change! What is it? People talk about it, they say they believe in it, they say they encourage it—they just don't want to do anything differently. Sound familiar? Most organizations, like most generations, think they have all the answers. In the same vein, few think that the next generation is particularly credible. What's my point? No organization can realistically shape its future without a plan that indicates where it wants to go, and how it wants to get there.

 

While the impact of organizational change, for better or worse, is eventually understood, many still, quite mistakenly, view continuity as corporate stasis, at best maintaining its status quo or at worst being actively resistant to change. I see it differently, wherein the seemingly conflicting forces of continuity and organizational change in these "new normal" times are little more than a misconception.

 

The "Yin Yang of Leadership," as some have called it, requires leaders to navigate continuity and change as a prerequisite to the success of any business. Add to that the extent to which organizations change over time, referred to as "path dependence," which presuppose that organizational continuity and change are intimately interdependent elements crucial to organizational sustainability. Thus, embracing the challenges and tradeoffs that occur as leaders work to bring about change necessitates maintaining continuity and consistency as an organizational dynamic. Lastly, it strives to bring people together and avoid cultural clashes—an "us versus them" environment. Managing continuity also challenges visionary leaders to incorporate salient aspects of the organization's core values, traditions and shared meaning from the past—its "pearls of wisdom," if you will.

 

Leadership, then, in its most basic form, is about moving an organization from point A to point B. In today's world of escalating expectations and declining resources, the long-term success of these efforts embrace continuity, define how organizational knowledge is effectively transferred, and create a culture of engagement, opportunity, validation and inclusion.

 

The fire service accomplishes this through its ongoing investment in training, education and succession planning, linking practical change to measurable outcomes, and never forgetting its rich past as both prelude to and precursor of the future. From an operational perspective, the fire service has successfully balanced the demands of continuity in today's changing, increasingly complex environment, via its reliance on several variables, namely:

 

  1. A fundamental commitment to both preservice and ongoing in-service training (perhaps best personified by the credo of the New York City Fire Academy, displayed in large letters and which says with irrevocable conviction above its entranceway: "Let No Man's Ghost Return To Say His Training Let Him Down").
  2. Practical experience in each skill area needed on an emergency basis.
  3. The existence of an outstanding faculty.
  4. A highly motivated workforce.
  5. A supportive administration.
  6. A history of holding everyone accountable, all of the time.
  7. Our reputation.
  8. And perhaps most important, the love of a grateful nation.

 

While we're obviously proud of this, the fire service, like other industries, needs to balance the importance of its rich history with a continuing need to change. It also needs to change because of September 11, and because society is changing.

 

New technology and the additional challenge of homeland security, in the fire service as elsewhere, test the resources of many organizations. They also require a new level of coordination and cooperation, coupled with a cultivation of organizational leadership, all the while maintaining a balance between distaste for the status quo without being a prisoner of ideology. More than the proclamation of a lofty goal, these challenges also require each individual on the front line to know exactly what to do and when to do it to achieve a defined goal.

 

In my experience, too many of us, to our discredit, focus on what's already happened, as opposed to what's about to happen. That has to change, and it can change by a better understanding of what needs to be done in advance of a problem, then ensuring that the right people are involved from the onset.

 

If denial blocks change, or if leaders or operations personnel have limited prior experience in dealing with the effects of change, potential gains can be lost, thereby necessitating a variety of recovery options. Discussing and planning for change-related problems, and then exercising these plans, is a start. The real issue, though, is how we go about mitigating problems before they occur. In prevention we have a cure, and it's in this area that government and industry must collaborate both in planning, in consequence management, and in support of those who everywhere, every day, are every nation's first line of defense.

 

Whether it's a tsunami in Japan, an earthquake in Haiti, a train derailment in India, an act of terrorism in Bulgaria or a forest fire in the United States, leaders channel their experience as a basis for current and prospective action. In circumstances such as these, the fire service also relies on its past experience, working to optimize its organizational effectiveness as it factors in prior performance indicators. It also works to maximize the value of its most important asset, its personnel, who see themselves as a family to be called upon in times of trouble. Here then is the difference, as this is a family of men and women who are linked by a special bond and a noble calling, that is to save lives at whatever cost.

 

Firefighters put themselves in harm's way to protect the citizens of all nations. These same firefighters are also ready to support one another whenever and wherever necessary. This was never truer than in the days following September 11, when we suffered such devastating losses, and the international fire community, and society in general, came to our aid.

 

While this respect and camaraderie are much appreciated, if you think about it, it's really a small measure when compared to the risks involved in doing this job on a daily basis. Like in the military, incomprehensible as it might seem to some, firefighters know and accept the fact that, literally, on a moment's notice, they could be called upon to make the ultimate sacrifice. If that's not defined as leadership, then what is?

 

While the fire service can be rigid and demanding, expecting people to "do what we say, because we say so," we recognize that this approach doesn't always work. That said, we have worked hard to redefine leadership as "getting people to do what you want them to do because they want to do it."

 

For hundreds of years, the fire service has gone from practice to theory. The phrase "iron men and wooden ladders," referring to an era when the fire service did little else but fight fires, embraces an a posteriori tradition as it adjusts to a priori change in an uncertain future, placing new emphasis on preventing fires as opposed to simply putting them out.

 

Being progressive in such an environment involves supporting organizational needs and requirements while effectively predicting the future. To do otherwise would be to remain stagnant, simply waiting for the next crisis to manage.

 

The phrase "the more things change" inexorably links continuity to change, as Socrates noted 2,500 years ago when he said, "Children today are tyrants." If we have learned anything from the fire service, it is that one doesn't have to turn on a television or go to the movies to find a hero. Our heroes are simply down the street, at every local firehouse.

 

In an ever-changing world in which we embrace continuity, change and leadership, the fire service honors those who died, by protecting those who live. As we tell every new firefighter on his or her very first day of training: "Be proud! Be brave! Be strong! But most of all, Be prepared!"

 

Stay safe.

 

 

 

The 911 FUND was created in the aftermath of September 11, 2001, by FDNY personnel who were privileged to work at the World Trade Center that day and for many days thereafter.  Ever since 9/11, we've worked to acquire apparatus, firefighting and medical equipment, then to donate it, along with training, to needy volunteer fire departments and communities around the world. 100 percent of the apparatus and equipment that we receive is donated to the 18 countries where we have worked (to date), for whom access to these items often means the difference between life and death for the firefighters we're working to help.

 

To contact Stephan Hittman, president of the 911 FUND, INC.: 441 Central Park Avenue, PO Box 644, Hartsdale, NY 10530-0644; 914-479-8800 tel; 914-725-7733 fax; www.911fund.org; or email at [email protected].